national parks: protect environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect environment 1.00
help protect 0.87
help environment 0.87
be important to environment 0.85
need protecting 0.84
be is protected 0.79
is protected 0.79
be protected 0.78
is protected area 0.78
be protected by government 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(park, help protect)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(national parks, protect environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(national parks, protect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(park, be protected)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(national parks, protect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(park, be is protected)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(national parks, protect environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(park, be is protected)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(park, be protected)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(park, help protect)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(park, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(park, be protected)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(park, help protect)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(park, be is protected)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, be is protected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national park, be is protected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is protected)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is protected area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(park, help protect)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(park, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(park, be is protected)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(park, be protected)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(national parks, protect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(yellowstone, is protected area)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is protected area)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(national park, be is protected)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national park, be is protected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(yellowstone, is protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is protected)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, be is protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, be is protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(national parks, protect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help protect)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(national parks, need protecting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is protected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected by government)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(national parks, is protected)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(national parks, help environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(national parks, is protected)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(national parks, is protected)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(national parks, need protecting)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(national parks, help protect)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(national parks, be protected)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(national parks, help environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(national parks, be important to environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(national parks, help environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(national parks, be protected by government)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(national parks, be protected)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(national parks, be protected by government)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(national parks, be protected by government)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(national parks, help protect)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(national parks, need protecting)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important to environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national parks, be protected)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(national parks, be important to environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(national parks, help protect)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(national parks, need protecting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(national parks, protect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(park, be is protected)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(park, be protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(park, help protect)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(park, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is protected area)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national park, be is protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is protected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, be is protected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(park, be is protected)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(park, be protected)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(park, help protect)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(national parks, protect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(park, be important to environment)