native american: own casinos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.76
, american
Weight: 0.70
, america
Weight: 0.69
, native
Weight: 0.52
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.70
, cherokee
Weight: 0.61
, spanish
Weight: 0.61
, eskimo
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
own casinos 1.00
have casinos 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(native american, own casinos)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(native american, own casinos)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(native, have casinos)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(native american, own casinos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(native, have casinos)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(native, own casinos)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, own casinos)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(native, have casinos)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(native, own casinos)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(american, own casinos)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(native american, own casinos)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(native american, own casinos)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(native, have casinos)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(native american, own casinos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(native american, own casinos)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(native american, have casinos)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(native american, have casinos)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(native american, have casinos)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(native american, have casinos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(native american, own casinos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(native american, own casinos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(native, have casinos)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(native, own casinos)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, own casinos)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(native, own casinos)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, own casinos)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(native american, own casinos)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(native, have casinos)