native american: were old people treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.76
, american
Weight: 0.70
, america
Weight: 0.69
, native
Weight: 0.52
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.70
, apache
Weight: 0.62
, cherokee
Weight: 0.61
, spanish
Weight: 0.61
, eskimo
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
were old people treated 1.00
were people treated 0.94
were treated 0.90
were were treated 0.90
be treated 0.86
were treated after war 0.86
were treated in war 0.85
were treated under encomienda system 0.84
were treated differently in north 0.83
were treated after world war 2 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(native american, were old people treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated after war) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(native american, were old people treated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, be treated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, were treated after war)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(american, be treated)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(american, were treated after war)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(native american, were old people treated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated after war) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(native american, were old people treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(native american, were old people treated)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(native american, were treated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(native american, were treated after war)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(native american, were treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated after war)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(native american, were treated after war)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(native american, were treated after world war 2)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after war)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(native american, were old people treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(native american, were old people treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, be treated)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated after war)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, be treated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(native american, were old people treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated after war)