native american: were people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.76
, american
Weight: 0.70
, america
Weight: 0.69
, native
Weight: 0.52
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.70
, cherokee
Weight: 0.61
, spanish
Weight: 0.61
, eskimo
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
were people 1.00
were different 0.82
were made 0.79
were similar 0.77
were more likely 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(george washington, were similar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(george washington, were similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(george washington, were similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(native american, were people)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(native american, were similar)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(native american, were more likely)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(native american, were similar)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(native american, were more likely)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(native american, were similar)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(native american, were more likely)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(native american, were similar)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(native american, were more likely)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(native american, were people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(native american, were people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(native american, were people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(george washington, were similar)