native american: were treated fairly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.76
, american
Weight: 0.70
, america
Weight: 0.69
, native
Weight: 0.52
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.70
, apache
Weight: 0.62
, cherokee
Weight: 0.61
, spanish
Weight: 0.61
, eskimo
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated fairly 1.00
were treated 0.88
were were treated 0.87
were treated poorly 0.85
were people treated 0.85
be treated 0.85
were treated differently in north 0.83
were treated under encomienda system 0.83
were treated in war 0.82
were old people treated 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(native american, were treated fairly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, be treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(american, be treated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated fairly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(native american, were treated fairly)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(native american, were treated poorly)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated poorly)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(native american, were treated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(native american, were treated poorly)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(native american, were old people treated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(native american, were treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(native american, were old people treated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(native american, were old people treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(native american, were old people treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(native american, were treated fairly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, be treated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(native american, were treated fairly) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, be treated)