native american: were treated under encomienda system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.76
, american
Weight: 0.70
, america
Weight: 0.69
, native
Weight: 0.52
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.70
, apache
Weight: 0.62
, cherokee
Weight: 0.61
, spanish
Weight: 0.61
, eskimo
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated under encomienda system 1.00
were treated 0.89
were were treated 0.87
were people treated 0.86
be treated 0.86
were treated poorly 0.84
were old people treated 0.84
were treated after war 0.83
were treated fairly 0.83
were treated in war 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, be treated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated after war)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, be treated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, were treated after war)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(american, be treated)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(american, were treated after war)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, be treated)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated after war)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(native american, were treated)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated poorly)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(native american, were treated poorly)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(native american, were treated poorly)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(native american, were old people treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(native american, were treated fairly)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(native american, were treated after war)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(native american, were old people treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(native american, were treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated fairly)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated after war)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(native american, were old people treated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(native american, were treated fairly)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(native american, were treated after war)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(native american, were old people treated)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after war)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, be treated)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated after war)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, be treated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated after war)