native: live in igloos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents native american
Weight: 0.73
, plant
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.49
Siblings inuit
Weight: 0.41
, wattle
Weight: 0.40
, power plant
Weight: 0.33
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.32
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in igloos 1.00
live in igloos built 0.98
live in igloos built with ice 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(inuit, live in igloos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(inuit, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(inuit, live in igloos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(native, live in igloos)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(native, live in igloos built)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(native, live in igloos built with ice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(native, live in igloos built)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(native, live in igloos built with ice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(native, live in igloos built)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(native, live in igloos built with ice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(native, live in igloos built with ice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(native, live in igloos built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(native, live in igloos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(native, live in igloos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(native, live in igloos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inuit, live in igloos)