native: run casinos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents native american
Weight: 0.73
, plant
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.49
Siblings inuit
Weight: 0.41
, wattle
Weight: 0.40
, power plant
Weight: 0.33
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.32
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
run casinos 1.00
have casinos 0.97
own casinos 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(native american, own casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(native, run casinos)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(native american, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(native, run casinos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(native american, have casinos)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(native american, own casinos)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(native american, have casinos)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(native american, own casinos)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(native american, own casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(native, run casinos)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(native american, have casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(native, run casinos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(native, run casinos)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(native, have casinos)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(native, have casinos)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(native, have casinos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(native, have casinos)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(native, own casinos)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(native, own casinos)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(native, own casinos)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(native, own casinos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(native, run casinos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(native, run casinos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(native american, have casinos)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(native american, own casinos)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(native american, have casinos)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(native, run casinos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(native american, own casinos)