natural gas: be considered nonrenewable resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.71
, power plant
Weight: 0.70
, natural
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.81
, oil
Weight: 0.67
, methane
Weight: 0.66
, gasoline
Weight: 0.65
, ethanol
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered nonrenewable resource 1.00
is nonrenewable resource 0.99
is limited resource 0.81
has quality resource 0.79
is non renewable energy 0.77
is renewable energy 0.76
is non renewable 0.76
is renewable 0.76
be renewable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(natural, has quality resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, is renewable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(oil, is non renewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is renewable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ethanol, is renewable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(oil, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(oil, is nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oil, is nonrenewable resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ethanol, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ethanol, is renewable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(gasoline, is non renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gasoline, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is renewable)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(oil, is non renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(oil, is non renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is limited resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is non renewable energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(natural gas, is non renewable energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is non renewable)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is non renewable energy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(natural gas, is non renewable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(natural gas, is limited resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable energy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(natural gas, is renewable energy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is non renewable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(natural gas, is limited resource)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, is non renewable energy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is limited resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is renewable energy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(natural gas, is renewable energy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(natural gas, is non renewable)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(natural gas, is renewable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is renewable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(natural gas, is renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resource)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ethanol, is renewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oil, is nonrenewable resource)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(oil, is non renewable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gasoline, is renewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resource)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)