natural gas: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.71
, power plant
Weight: 0.70
, natural
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.81
, oil
Weight: 0.67
, methane
Weight: 0.66
, gasoline
Weight: 0.65
, ethanol
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is limited resource 0.87
be major resource in middle east 0.80
is nonrenewable resource 0.80
be considered nonrenewable resource 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(natural, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(oil, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(oil, is nonrenewable resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oil, is nonrenewable resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(natural gas, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is limited resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be major resource in middle east)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(natural gas, is limited resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(natural gas, is limited resource)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is limited resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(natural gas, be major resource in middle east)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be major resource in middle east)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(natural gas, be major resource in middle east)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oil, is nonrenewable resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)