natural: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.61
, field
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.53
, function
Weight: 0.52
, resource
Weight: 0.51
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.68
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.32
, probable cause
Weight: 0.32
, mineral
Weight: 0.31
, pure
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
has quality resources 0.91
has quality rights 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(natural, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(natural, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resources)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(natural, has quality resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(natural, has quality resources)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(natural, has quality rights)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(natural, has quality rights)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(natural, has quality rights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(natural, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)