natural: has quality rights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.61
, field
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.53
, function
Weight: 0.52
, resource
Weight: 0.51
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.68
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.32
, probable cause
Weight: 0.32
, mineral
Weight: 0.31
, pure
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality rights 1.00
has quality resources 0.77
has quality resource 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(natural, has quality rights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(natural, has quality rights)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(natural, has quality rights)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resources)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(natural, has quality resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(natural, has quality resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(natural, has quality resources)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(natural, has quality resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(natural, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(natural, has quality rights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(natural, has quality rights)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)