naturalism: be important in literature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ideology
Weight: 0.64
, movement
Weight: 0.58
, philosophy
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.53
, belief
Weight: 0.49
Siblings liberalism
Weight: 0.35
, romanticism
Weight: 0.35
, anarchism
Weight: 0.34
, atheism
Weight: 0.34
, realism
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in literature 1.00
be important in art 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(movement, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(naturalism, be important in literature)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(movement, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(movement, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(realism, be important in literature)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(realism, be important in art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(movement, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(realism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(realism, be important in literature)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(realism, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(realism, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(naturalism, be important in literature)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(naturalism, be important in art)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(naturalism, be important in art)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(naturalism, be important in art)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(naturalism, be important in literature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(movement, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(realism, be important in literature)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(realism, be important in art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(naturalism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(movement, be important in art)