naturalist: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biologist
Weight: 0.64
, resident
Weight: 0.55
, scientist
Weight: 0.52
, person
Weight: 0.51
Siblings charles darwin
Weight: 0.64
, henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.59
, alfred russel wallace
Weight: 0.52
, botanist
Weight: 0.34
, ecologist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(naturalist, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(naturalist, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(naturalist, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(naturalist, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(naturalist, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(naturalist, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(naturalist, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(naturalist, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(naturalist, has quality questions)