nature: be good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.67
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, object
Weight: 0.63
Siblings regular
Weight: 0.46
, wild animal
Weight: 0.34
, human life
Weight: 0.33
, humanity
Weight: 0.33
, environment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good 1.00
be solid 0.79
be beautiful as well as useful 0.79
be wonderful 0.79
be very hard 0.77
be beautiful but some be dangerous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nature, be good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(object, be solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nature, be good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(object, be solid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(object, be solid)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nature, be good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(object, be solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nature, be good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(nature, be good)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(nature, be very hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nature, be very hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nature, be very hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nature, be wonderful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(nature, be wonderful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nature, be wonderful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nature, be very hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nature, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(object, be beautiful as well as useful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(object, be solid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(object, be beautiful as well as useful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(nature, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(object, be solid)