nature: be important to man

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.67
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, object
Weight: 0.63
Siblings regular
Weight: 0.46
, wild animal
Weight: 0.34
, human life
Weight: 0.33
, humanity
Weight: 0.33
, environment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to man 1.00
be important for all person 0.85
be important 0.84
be important for human be 0.81
be more powerful than man 0.78
be dangerous to person 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(environment, be important for all person)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be dangerous to person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(environment, be important for all person)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(environment, be important for all person)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(wild animal, be dangerous to person)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be dangerous to person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(nature, be important to man)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nature, be important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nature, be important for human be)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(nature, be more powerful than man)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(nature, be important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(nature, be important for human be)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nature, be important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important for human be)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(nature, be important for human be)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important to man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nature, be important to man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(environment, be important for all person)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important to man)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wild animal, be dangerous to person)