nature: be more powerful than man

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.67
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, object
Weight: 0.63
Siblings regular
Weight: 0.46
, wild animal
Weight: 0.34
, human life
Weight: 0.33
, humanity
Weight: 0.33
, environment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more powerful than man 1.00
be more complex than most could imagine 0.82
be used to more than one purpose 0.79
be important to man 0.78
appear far than they really be 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(object, be used to more than one purpose)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(object, appear far than they really be)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(object, appear far than they really be)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(object, be used to more than one purpose)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(object, be used to more than one purpose)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(object, appear far than they really be)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(object, be used to more than one purpose)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(object, appear far than they really be)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(nature, be more powerful than man)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(nature, be important to man)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nature, be more complex than most could imagine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(nature, be more complex than most could imagine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nature, be important to man)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(nature, be more complex than most could imagine)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(nature, be important to man)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nature, be more complex than most could imagine)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important to man)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(object, be used to more than one purpose)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(object, appear far than they really be)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(object, be used to more than one purpose)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(nature, be more powerful than man)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(object, appear far than they really be)