nature: be wonderful

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.67
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, object
Weight: 0.63
Siblings regular
Weight: 0.46
, wild animal
Weight: 0.34
, human life
Weight: 0.33
, humanity
Weight: 0.33
, environment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be wonderful 1.00
be lovely 0.87
be beautiful 0.84
be beautiful and inspire 0.79
be beautiful as well as useful 0.79
be good 0.79
be beautiful but some be dangerous 0.78
be one of our great ressources 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nature, be wonderful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be beautiful and inspire)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nature, be wonderful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(wild animal, be beautiful and inspire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful and inspire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(nature, be wonderful)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nature, be lovely)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(nature, be lovely)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(nature, be one of our great ressources)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(nature, be beautiful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nature, be beautiful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(nature, be lovely)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nature, be beautiful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(nature, be beautiful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nature, be beautiful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(nature, be beautiful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(nature, be beautiful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(nature, be beautiful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nature, be lovely)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nature, be one of our great ressources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nature, be good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(nature, be one of our great ressources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nature, be good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(nature, be good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nature, be one of our great ressources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nature, be wonderful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wild animal, be beautiful and inspire)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(nature, be wonderful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(object, be beautiful as well as useful)