nature: is more important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.67
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, object
Weight: 0.63
Siblings living thing
Weight: 0.52
, gravitation
Weight: 0.51
, seduction
Weight: 0.51
, regular
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more important 1.00
be important in taoism 0.89
be important to us 0.82
be important for humans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(nature, is more important)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(nature, be important in taoism)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nature, be important in taoism)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nature, be important in taoism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(nature, be important to us)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(nature, be important to us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important in taoism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nature, be important to us)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(nature, be important for humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(nature, be important for humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(nature, be important for humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important to us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nature, be important for humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nature, is more important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(nature, is more important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(nature, is more important)