nebraska: be important in flight of cranes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, program
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, team
Weight: 0.55
Siblings texas
Weight: 0.64
, kansas
Weight: 0.35
, wisconsin
Weight: 0.35
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in flight of cranes 1.00
be important in flight of sandhill cranes 0.94
be important in flight 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be important in flight of sandhill cranes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nebraska, be important in flight of sandhill cranes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be important in flight)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(nebraska, be important in flight of sandhill cranes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(nebraska, be important in flight)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(nebraska, be important in flight)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be important in flight of sandhill cranes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be important in flight)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(nebraska, be important in flight of cranes)