nectar: be important to bees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.61
, insect
Weight: 0.56
, sweet
Weight: 0.55
, liquid
Weight: 0.50
, brand
Weight: 0.47
Siblings honey bee
Weight: 0.34
, amino acid
Weight: 0.34
, sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.34
, ascorbic acid
Weight: 0.34
, honey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to bees 1.00
attract bees 0.90
be bad for hummingbirds 0.79
contribute to bee nutrition 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(nectar, be important to bees)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nectar, attract bees)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(nectar, attract bees)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nectar, attract bees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nectar, be bad for hummingbirds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(nectar, be bad for hummingbirds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(nectar, be bad for hummingbirds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(nectar, attract bees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nectar, contribute to bee nutrition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nectar, be bad for hummingbirds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(nectar, contribute to bee nutrition)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(nectar, contribute to bee nutrition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nectar, contribute to bee nutrition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(nectar, be important to bees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(nectar, be important to bees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nectar, be important to bees)