need: assessment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents good
Weight: 0.62
, move
Weight: 0.62
, desire
Weight: 0.61
, type
Weight: 0.60
Siblings heating
Weight: 0.65
, medicine
Weight: 0.63
, many people
Weight: 0.63
, today
Weight: 0.63
, hunger
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
assessment 1.00
have assessment 0.99
have important assessment 0.97
have conducted assessments reviews 0.85
analysis 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(need, assessment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(need, have important assessment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(need, have important assessment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(need, have conducted assessments reviews)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(need, analysis)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(need, analysis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(need, have important assessment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(need, have conducted assessments reviews)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(need, have important assessment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(need, have conducted assessments reviews)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(need, have conducted assessments reviews)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(need, analysis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(need, analysis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(need, assessment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(need, assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(need, assessment)