negligence: be vs gross negligence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents charge
Weight: 0.65
, tort
Weight: 0.63
, cause
Weight: 0.63
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings manslaughter
Weight: 0.34
, child neglect
Weight: 0.34
, heart failure
Weight: 0.33
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, respiratory failure
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs gross negligence 1.00
be vs negligence 0.96
has trait negligence 0.84
be vs malpractice 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tort, has trait negligence)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(negligence, be vs gross negligence)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tort, has trait negligence)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tort, has trait negligence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tort, has trait negligence)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(negligence, be vs gross negligence)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(negligence, be vs gross negligence)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(negligence, be vs negligence)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(negligence, be vs negligence)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(negligence, be vs negligence)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(negligence, be vs malpractice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(negligence, be vs malpractice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(negligence, be vs malpractice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(negligence, be vs negligence)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(negligence, be vs malpractice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(negligence, be vs gross negligence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(negligence, be vs gross negligence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tort, has trait negligence)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(negligence, be vs gross negligence)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tort, has trait negligence)