negligence: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents charge
Weight: 0.65
, tort
Weight: 0.63
, cause
Weight: 0.63
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings manslaughter
Weight: 0.34
, child neglect
Weight: 0.34
, heart failure
Weight: 0.33
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, respiratory failure
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
be good 0.82
has quality evil 0.80
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(failure, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tort, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(failure, is good thing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(failure, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ignorance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ignorance, is good thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(negligence, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(negligence, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ignorance, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, is good thing)