negligence: has quality wrong

Related concepts

Parents	charge Weight: 0.65 , tort Weight: 0.63 , cause Weight: 0.63 , failure Weight: 0.61
Siblings	manslaughter Weight: 0.34 , child neglect Weight: 0.34 , heart failure Weight: 0.33 , ignorance Weight: 0.33 , respiratory failure Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality wrong	1.00
has quality bad	0.87
has quality good	0.85
is civil wrong	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(negligence, has quality wrong)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(tort, is civil wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(negligence, has quality wrong)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(negligence, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(tort, has quality wrong)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(tort, is civil wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(tort, has quality wrong)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(tort, is civil wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(tort, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(tort, is civil wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality wrong)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(heart failure, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(negligence, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(negligence, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(negligence, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(tort, is civil wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality wrong)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(heart failure, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(tort, has quality wrong)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(tort, is civil wrong)