negligence: is new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents charge
Weight: 0.65
, tort
Weight: 0.63
, cause
Weight: 0.63
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings manslaughter
Weight: 0.34
, child neglect
Weight: 0.34
, heart failure
Weight: 0.33
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, respiratory failure
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is new york 1.00
is york 0.98
is new york law 0.94
is york law 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(negligence, is new york)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is new york law)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(negligence, is new york law)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(negligence, is new york law)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(negligence, is new york law)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(negligence, is york)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is york)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(negligence, is york law)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(negligence, is york)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is york law)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(negligence, is york)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(negligence, is york law)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(negligence, is york law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(negligence, is new york)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(negligence, is new york)