neighbor: is wifi password

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents victim
Weight: 0.70
, family member
Weight: 0.68
, friend
Weight: 0.65
, parent
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.61
Siblings husband
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.65
, homeowner
Weight: 0.54
, cousin
Weight: 0.36
, mother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wifi password 1.00
be wifi without password 0.99
is password 0.93
is wifi 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(neighbor, is wifi password)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, be wifi without password)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(neighbor, be wifi without password)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(neighbor, be wifi without password)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(neighbor, be wifi without password)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, is wifi)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(neighbor, is wifi)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(neighbor, is wifi)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, is password)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(neighbor, is password)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(neighbor, is wifi)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(neighbor, is password)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(neighbor, is password)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, is wifi password)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(neighbor, is wifi password)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(neighbor, is wifi password)