neighbours: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.54
, series
Weight: 0.47
, soap
Weight: 0.44
, program
Weight: 0.37
Siblings talk show
Weight: 0.28
, game show
Weight: 0.28
, soap opera
Weight: 0.28
, fresh air
Weight: 0.27
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00
is annoying 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(soap opera, is boring)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(soap opera, is annoying)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(soap opera, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soap opera, is boring)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(soap opera, is annoying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(soap opera, is annoying)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(neighbours, is boring)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(neighbours, is annoying)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(neighbours, is annoying)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(neighbours, is annoying)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(neighbours, is annoying)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(neighbours, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(neighbours, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soap opera, is boring)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(neighbours, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soap opera, is annoying)