neo: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.39
, management
Weight: 0.38
, company
Weight: 0.37
Siblings archetype
Weight: 0.30
, medusa
Weight: 0.30
, superman
Weight: 0.29
, avenger
Weight: 0.29
, heroine
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(archetype, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(superman, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(medusa, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(medusa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(medusa, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(superman, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(superman, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(archetype, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(archetype, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(neo, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(neo, has quality better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(neo, has quality better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(neo, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(neo, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(medusa, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(archetype, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(neo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(superman, has quality good)