nep: be called policy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.43
, service
Weight: 0.43
, failure
Weight: 0.32
, country
Weight: 0.30
Siblings escort service
Weight: 0.27
, service station
Weight: 0.27
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.26
, postal service
Weight: 0.26
, bar service
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called policy 1.00
be called policy of reforms 0.86
be called policy of economic reforms 0.85
policy of reforms 0.84
policy of economic reforms 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(policy, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(nep, be called policy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policy, be called policy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, be called policy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(policy, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(nep, be called policy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(nep, be called policy)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(nep, be called policy of economic reforms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(nep, be called policy of reforms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(nep, policy of economic reforms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(nep, policy of reforms)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nep, be called policy of reforms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(nep, be called policy of economic reforms)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(nep, policy of economic reforms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(nep, policy of reforms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(nep, be called policy of economic reforms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nep, policy of reforms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(nep, policy of economic reforms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(nep, be called policy of reforms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nep, policy of economic reforms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nep, be called policy of reforms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(nep, be called policy of economic reforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(nep, be called policy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(nep, be called policy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be called policy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(nep, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be called policy)