nep: policy of reforms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.43
, service
Weight: 0.43
, failure
Weight: 0.32
, country
Weight: 0.30
Siblings escort service
Weight: 0.27
, service station
Weight: 0.27
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.26
, postal service
Weight: 0.26
, bar service
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
policy of reforms 1.00
be called policy of reforms 0.99
policy of economic reforms 0.98
be called policy of economic reforms 0.97
be called policy 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(policy, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nep, policy of reforms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policy, be called policy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, be called policy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(policy, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(nep, policy of reforms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(nep, policy of reforms)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(nep, be called policy of reforms)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(nep, policy of economic reforms)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(nep, be called policy of economic reforms)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(nep, policy of economic reforms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(nep, be called policy of reforms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(nep, be called policy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(nep, be called policy of economic reforms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nep, be called policy of reforms)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(nep, be called policy of economic reforms)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(nep, policy of economic reforms)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nep, policy of economic reforms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(nep, be called policy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nep, be called policy of reforms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(nep, be called policy of economic reforms)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(nep, be called policy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(nep, be called policy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nep, policy of reforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be called policy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nep, policy of reforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be called policy)