nerd: have high pitched voices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.55
, insult
Weight: 0.54
, word
Weight: 0.52
, man
Weight: 0.51
Siblings fart
Weight: 0.33
, chick
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high pitched voices 1.00
have voices 0.85
have nasally voices 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, have voices)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nerd, have high pitched voices)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, have voices)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, have voices)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, have voices)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nerd, have high pitched voices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nerd, have high pitched voices)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(nerd, have nasally voices)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nerd, have nasally voices)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(nerd, have nasally voices)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have nasally voices)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have high pitched voices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nerd, have high pitched voices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, have voices)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(nerd, have high pitched voices)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, have voices)