nervous system: has quality worse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.66
, organ
Weight: 0.64
, process
Weight: 0.63
, time
Weight: 0.63
, condition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings convulsion
Weight: 0.53
, ganglion
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worse 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality worse)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ganglion, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ganglion, has quality worse)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ganglion, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(nervous system, has quality worse)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(nervous system, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality worse)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)