network: extract automatically features

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.66
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.83
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.83
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, neural network
Weight: 0.67
, backbone
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
extract automatically features 1.00
extract automatically useful features 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(neural network, extract automatically features)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(neural network, extract automatically useful features)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(neural network, extract automatically useful features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(neural network, extract automatically useful features)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(neural network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(neural network, extract automatically features)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(network, extract automatically features)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(network, extract automatically useful features)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(network, extract automatically useful features)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(network, extract automatically useful features)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(network, extract automatically useful features)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(network, extract automatically features)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(network, extract automatically features)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(neural network, extract automatically features)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(network, extract automatically features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(neural network, extract automatically useful features)