network: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.66
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.83
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.83
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, neural network
Weight: 0.67
, backbone
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
is good thing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(network, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(security system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(network, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(security system, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(neural network, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(neural network, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(network, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(security system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(network, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(neural network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(neural network, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(neural network, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(neural network, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(network, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(network, has quality better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(network, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(network, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(network, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(network, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(network, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(network, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(network, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(security system, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(neural network, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(neural network, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(security system, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(network, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)