network: is non convex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.66
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.83
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.83
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, neural network
Weight: 0.67
, backbone
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is non convex 1.00
is non linear 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(neural network, is non convex)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(neural network, is non linear)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(neural network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(neural network, is non convex)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(neural network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(neural network, is non linear)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(network, is non convex)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(network, is non linear)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(network, is non linear)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(network, is non linear)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(network, is non linear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(network, is non convex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(network, is non convex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(neural network, is non convex)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(neural network, is non linear)