network: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.66
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.83
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.83
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, neural network
Weight: 0.67
, backbone
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be beneficial to organisation 0.80
extract automatically useful features 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(backbone, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(neural network, extract automatically useful features)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(neural network, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(neural network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(neural network, is useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(computer network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(computer network, is useful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(backbone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(backbone, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(neural network, extract automatically useful features)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(neural network, extract automatically useful features)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(network, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(network, extract automatically useful features)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(network, extract automatically useful features)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(network, be beneficial to organisation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(network, be beneficial to organisation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(network, be beneficial to organisation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(network, be beneficial to organisation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(network, extract automatically useful features)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(network, extract automatically useful features)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(network, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(neural network, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(neural network, extract automatically useful features)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(computer network, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(backbone, is useful)