nevada: have 6 electoral votes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, country
Weight: 0.63
, sierra nevada
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.56
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.72
, california
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.37
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have 6 electoral votes 1.00
have 6 votes 0.91
have polls 0.83
have few polls 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(nevada, have few polls)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(nevada, have few polls)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(nevada, have few polls)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(nevada, have 6 votes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nevada, have 6 votes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nevada, have polls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(nevada, have polls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nevada, have few polls)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(nevada, have polls)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(nevada, have 6 votes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(nevada, have 6 votes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(nevada, have polls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(nevada, have 6 electoral votes)