nevada: is important state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, country
Weight: 0.63
, sierra nevada
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.56
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.72
, california
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.37
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is important state 1.00
has state state 0.87
be called sagebush state 0.83
be called state 0.83
be important to history 0.79
is growing state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(nevada, is important state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(colorado, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(nevada, is important state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(las vegas, be called state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be called state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(colorado, be called state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(colorado, be called state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(nevada, is important state)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nevada, has state state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nevada, has state state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(nevada, has state state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nevada, be called state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nevada, be called state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(nevada, be called state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(nevada, be called sagebush state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nevada, be called sagebush state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nevada, be called sagebush state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nevada, be called sagebush state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(nevada, is growing state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nevada, is growing state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(nevada, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nevada, is growing state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is growing state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(nevada, be important to history)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(nevada, be important to history)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nevada, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(nevada, be important to history)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(nevada, be important to history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(nevada, is important state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(las vegas, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(colorado, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(nevada, is important state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)