nevada: was named state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, country
Weight: 0.63
, sierra nevada
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.56
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.72
, california
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.37
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named state 1.00
be called sagebush state 0.82
be called state 0.82
was named nevada 0.78
has state state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(nevada, was named state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(colorado, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(nevada, was named state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(las vegas, be called state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(colorado, be called state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(colorado, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(nevada, was named state)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(nevada, was named nevada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nevada, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nevada, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(nevada, be called state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nevada, be called sagebush state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nevada, be called sagebush state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(nevada, be called sagebush state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nevada, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(nevada, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nevada, was named nevada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nevada, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(nevada, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nevada, be called sagebush state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(nevada, was named nevada)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nevada, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named nevada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(nevada, was named state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(las vegas, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(colorado, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(nevada, was named state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)