new england: be a part of unite state

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.74
, country
Weight: 0.65
, north america
Weight: 0.65
, england
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.75
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, vermont
Weight: 0.68
, new orleans
Weight: 0.68
, maine
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of unite state 1.00
be defined as unite state large city 0.91
be defined as large city in unite state 0.91
be used to assemble state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new york, be defined as unite state large city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new england, be a part of unite state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(country, be used to assemble state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new england, be a part of unite state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(country, be used to assemble state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new york, be defined as unite state large city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(new york, be defined as unite state large city)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(country, be used to assemble state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new york, be defined as unite state large city)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(new england, be a part of unite state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(country, be used to assemble state)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(new england, be a part of unite state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.06
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(new england, be a part of unite state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new england, be a part of unite state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new york, be defined as unite state large city)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(country, be used to assemble state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new york, be defined as unite state large city)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(new england, be a part of unite state)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(country, be used to assemble state)