new england: be best place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.74
, country
Weight: 0.65
, north america
Weight: 0.65
, england
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.75
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, vermont
Weight: 0.68
, new orleans
Weight: 0.68
, maine
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best place live 1.00
was better place live 0.93
was good place build 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be best place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(new york city, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(new york city, be best place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(new england, be best place live)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(new england, was better place live)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(new england, was better place live)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new england, was better place live)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(new england, was better place live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new england, was good place build)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(new england, was good place build)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(new england, was good place build)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new england, was good place build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new england, be best place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new england, be best place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new england, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(new york city, be best place live)