new england: be colder than england

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.74
, country
Weight: 0.65
, north america
Weight: 0.65
, england
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.75
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, vermont
Weight: 0.68
, new orleans
Weight: 0.68
, maine
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be colder than england 1.00
is england 0.85
is new england 0.84
be called england 0.83
be called new england 0.82
have warmer climate than newfoundland 0.81
was most difficult region for england control 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(england, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new england, be colder than england)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(england, be called england)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new england, be colder than england)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(england, be called england)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(england, be called new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(england, be called new england)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(england, be called england)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called england)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(england, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(england, be called england)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(new england, be colder than england)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called england)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(maine, be called england)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(maine, be called england)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maine, be called new england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new england, be colder than england)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, is england)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, is new england)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new england, be called england)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(new england, be called england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(new england, is england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(new england, is new england)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new england, be called new england)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(new england, be called england)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called england)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(new england, is england)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new england, have warmer climate than newfoundland)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new england, is england)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, is new england)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(new england, is new england)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called new england)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(new england, be called new england)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new england, have warmer climate than newfoundland)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(new england, have warmer climate than newfoundland)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(new england, have warmer climate than newfoundland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new england, be colder than england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(england, be called england)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(england, be called new england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called england)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(maine, be called england)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(england, be called england)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(new england, be colder than england)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(england, be called new england)