new england: was found

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.74
, country
Weight: 0.65
, north america
Weight: 0.65
, england
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.75
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, vermont
Weight: 0.68
, new orleans
Weight: 0.68
, maine
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was found 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new england, was found)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was found)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new england, was found)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was found)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was found)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(new england, was found)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new england, was found)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new england, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was found)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new england, was found)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)