new england: was most difficult region for england control

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.74
, country
Weight: 0.65
, north america
Weight: 0.65
, england
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.75
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, vermont
Weight: 0.68
, new orleans
Weight: 0.68
, maine
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was most difficult region for england control 1.00
was most difficult region keep under control 0.89
was most difficult region keep 0.87
was hardest region control 0.84
is new england 0.80
be called new england 0.80
is england 0.80
be called england 0.80
be colder than england 0.79
was important to great britain 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(england, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(england, be called england)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(england, be called england)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(england, be called new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(england, be called new england)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(england, be called england)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called england)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(england, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(england, be called england)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called england)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(maine, be called england)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(maine, be called england)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maine, be called new england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(new england, was most difficult region keep)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region keep)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(new england, was most difficult region keep)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(new england, was hardest region control)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, is new england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new england, was hardest region control)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, is england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(new england, was most difficult region keep under control)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new england, be called england)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new england, was hardest region control)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region keep under control)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(new england, be called england)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(new england, is new england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new england, was hardest region control)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(new england, be called england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(new england, is england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new england, be called new england)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region keep)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(new england, is england)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(new england, is new england)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new england, be colder than england)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(new england, be called new england)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new england, be colder than england)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(new england, be colder than england)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(new england, was most difficult region keep under control)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region keep under control)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called england)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new england, be colder than england)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new england, was important to great britain)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, is new england)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called new england)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new england, is england)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(new england, was important to great britain)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(england, be called england)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(england, be called new england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called england)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(maine, be called england)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(england, be called england)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(england, be called new england)