new hampshire: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
has state first 0.87
is red state 0.81
is best state 0.80
be under state of emergency 0.76
be in state of emergency 0.76
is commonwealth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(maine, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(maine, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(massachusetts, is commonwealth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is commonwealth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maine, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(maine, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maine, is red state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(maine, is best state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is commonwealth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be under state of emergency)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state of emergency)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(maine, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(maine, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(massachusetts, is commonwealth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mississippi, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(alabama, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alabama, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(alabama, be under state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(alabama, be under state of emergency)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(alabama, be in state of emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state of emergency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(new hampshire, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is red state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state first)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(new hampshire, has state first)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is best state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is commonwealth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(maine, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alabama, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(alabama, be under state of emergency)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state of emergency)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is commonwealth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(maine, is red state)