new hampshire: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
is best state 0.92
be best state live 0.85
be best state live in 0.85
be united best club support 0.76
be great for business 0.75
is top 10 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(maine, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maine, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(maine, is best state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is best)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be great for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(maine, is best state)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york city, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alabama, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(manchester, be great for business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manchester, be great for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is best state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be best state live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alabama, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new york city, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(manchester, be great for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, is best)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)