new hampshire: is best state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best state 1.00
is best 0.92
be best state live 0.92
be best state live in 0.92
has state state 0.80
has state first 0.79
was most difficult region keep 0.76
was important to nation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(maine, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region keep)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(new england, was most difficult region keep)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maine, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region keep)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(maine, is best state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is best)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was important to nation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(maine, is best state)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maine, has state state)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(new england, was most difficult region keep)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alabama, is best state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york city, is best)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, was important to nation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(new york city, was important to nation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is best state)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is best)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(new hampshire, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state first)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(new hampshire, has state first)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state first)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state first)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region keep)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new york city, was important to nation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alabama, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new york city, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region keep)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)