new hampshire: was established

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
was established 1.00
was formed 0.83
was created 0.80
was founded in 1623 0.79
was founded 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(maine, was established)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(maine, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maine, was established)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was established)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was created)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alabama, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(maine, was established)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mississippi, was created)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mississippi, was created)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alabama, was founded)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(alabama, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was established)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was formed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was created)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maine, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mississippi, was created)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(alabama, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maine, was established)