new hampshire: was named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named 1.00
is named 0.97
is named after 0.94
was named hampshire 0.85
was named new hampshire 0.85
was chosen for name 0.83
was estabilished 0.78
was found 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(massachusetts, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new england, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(maine, was named)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was found)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new england, was found)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was found)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new england, was found)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(massachusetts, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new england, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lake champlain, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is named)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is named after)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was chosen for name)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is named)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was estabilished)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is named after)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was found)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is named)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was found)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is named after)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was estabilished)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was estabilished)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was found)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was estabilished)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was found)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was chosen for name)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was chosen for name)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was chosen for name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new england, was found)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was found)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lake champlain, was named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new england, was found)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was found)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named)